Shout out to Lyn-Genet Recitas, New York Times best selling author of “The Plan” and the “The Plan Cookbook”



Shout out to Lyn-Genet Recitas, the New York times Best Selling author of “The Plan”. My social media class ‪#‎Mktg410‬ will be working with her on a 15 page social media audit and plan. In return she will be coaching them with her social media knowledge and conference in our class on January 6th, 2015. This is a copy of her newly released cook book which is available on Amazon. She deserves a shout out for working with my students at the University of Oregon! #Lyn-Genet @Lyn-Genet #GoDucks #UofO #ThePlan

Be Present. Believe. Become.

Lyn-Genet and her team has helped hundreds of thousands of clients with long term positive changes in their health, weight and vitality. Our focus is on creating internal harmony using the precepts of The Lyn-Genet Plan, an anti-inflammatory diet. The Lyn-Genet Plan reduces chronic low grade inflammation which is the basis for premature aging, disease and weight gain.

You can choose a plan that fits your needs and budget, we offer 20 day and 30 day plans with Lyn-Genet or an associate.

Our staff members have been featured on The Dr. Oz Show, Fox News, USA Weekend, More Magazine, and Crain’s NY.

If you would like to book an appointment please email


contact-form][contact-field label='Name' type='name' required='1'/][contact-field label='Email' type='email' required='1'/][contact-field label='Website' type='url'/][contact-field label='Comment' type='textarea' required='1'/][/contact-form] The Lyn-Genet Plan

Havaianas Case Study

1) What was the original target market for Havaiana’s and how has that changed?






2) How were Havaiana’s respositioned in Brazil and Europe?







3) What was the Havaiana’s brand strategy?










4) What was done to rebrand the Brazilian flip flop?









5) Who are the primary competitors for Havaiana’s?








6) What is the primary focus of Hvaiana’s advertising?









How Havaianas built a global brand

By Dominique Turpin

The story

The Havaianas brand of rubber flip-flop sandals started life 50 years ago as a basic shoe for poor plantation workers in Brazil. The brand became a staple in the country before gaining fresh impetus in the mid-1990s, when parent company Alpargatas decided to reposition the declining brand as an aspirational fashion product. It hired leading designers to come up with attractive colours and designs and soon Brazilian and then international celebrities were wearing the new, colourful and stylish, higher-priced sandals. Sales grew rapidly.

High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email to buy additional rights.

However, the market was saturated in Brazil, where Havaianas sold 850 pairs of flip-flops for every 1,000 people in 2007. And although it was enjoying strong overseas sales growth in 65 countries, it did not have a strategy for international expansion. In 2008 Marcio Luiz Simoes Utsch, Alpargatas chief executive, decided to try to turn Havaianas into Brazil’s first truly global brand.

The challenge

Making Havaianas a global brand would require further expansion in Europe, the US and Asia. Although wealthy markets with huge potential, they required several responses from Havaianas.

It would have to expand its range of colours and designs to appeal to consumers who were more sophisticated and who did not have either the same flip-flop culture or climate as Brazilians.
Heavy investment in sales, marketing and production was necessary.
Rivals included successful brands such as Crocs, Rip Curl and Quicksilver.
Lack of precedent: global brands had generally come out of the US, western Europe or Japan, not emerging markets.

The strategy

The key elements of Havaianas’s strategy were a constant focus on product innovation; a consistent global marketing and communications strategy; and fast, flexible responses to consumer tastes.

The company introduced new sandals with closed tops for cooler climates, sandals with straps around the ankle, and even sandals with real diamonds for fashion shows. It also kept the Havaianas brand fresh by introducing socks, bags and softer, washable shoes.

The marketing message suggested innovation and aspiration; it also built on Brazil’s positive image overseas by portraying Havaianas as a colourful, joyful, simple product. This general message still allowed the company to tailor its approach to different countries. For instance, in the US, Havaianas was careful not to promote its sandals to college students so much that it threatened the brand’s “cool” edge in this demographic; in France, sales took off when the French importer positioned the brand in the luxury market alongside design names such as Lacoste and Jean Paul Gaultier.

To help maintain a consistent message, the company preferred to run its own operations rather than work through local importers and distributors. The main exception was Europe, where it has five offices but 18 distributors.

The company reacted fast to market intelligence. Sales slumped if the flip-flops were made outside Brazil, so Havaianas opened a new plant in the southeast of the country. When it realised customers liked shops with a full range of its flip-flops, it opened stores in Rome, Paris, London and New York.

The results

The brand is sold in more than 80 countries, helping Alpargatas to post total sales of R$2.6bn in 2011, up from R$1.7bn in 2008.

The brand manages both to remain popular with all classes of people in Brazil, while also selling as a premium product abroad.

The lessons

Turning Havaianas into a global brand was a triumph of planning and classic marketing techniques, in which diligence and creativity are allied to constant innovation.

At its centre was a simple yet innovative product that is genuinely meaningful for consumers. The company maintained a clear product focus and was careful to remain flexible.

Additionally, Havaianas focused on as many markets as possible, making it harder for competitors to gain a foothold.



Social Networking Sites and Our Lives

Social networking sites and our lives

Social networking sites and our lives

Questions have been raised about the social impact of widespread use of social networking sites (SNS) like Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace, and Twitter. Do these technologies isolate people and truncate their relationships? Or are there benefits associated with being connected to others in this way? The Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project decided to examine SNS in a survey that explored people’s overall social networks and how use of these technologies is related to trust, tolerance, social support, and community and political engagement.

The findings presented here paint a rich and complex picture of the role that digital technology plays in people’s social worlds. Wherever possible, we seek to disentangle whether people’s varying social behaviors and attitudes are related to the different ways they use social networking sites, or to other relevant demographic characteristics, such as age, gender and social class.

The number of those using social networking sites has nearly doubled since 2008 and the population of SNS users has gotten older.

In this Pew Internet sample, 79% of American adults said they used the internet and nearly half of adults (47%), or 59% of internet users, say they use at least one of SNS. This is close to double the 26% of adults (34% of internet users) who used a SNS in 2008. Among other things, this means the average age of adult-SNS users has shifted from 33 in 2008 to 38 in 2010.  Over half of all adult SNS users are now over the age of 35. Some 56% of SNS users now are female.

Facebook dominates the SNS space in this survey: 92% of SNS users are on Facebook; 29% use MySpace, 18% used LinkedIn and 13% use Twitter.

There is considerable variance in the way people use various social networking sites: 52% of Facebook users and 33% of Twitter users engage with the platform daily, while only 7% of MySpace and 6% of LinkedIn users do the same.

On Facebook on an average day:

  • 15% of Facebook users update their own status.
  • 22% comment on another’s post or status.
  • 20% comment on another user’s photos.
  • 26% “Like” another user’s content.
  • 10% send another user a private message

Facebook users are more trusting than others.

We asked people if they felt “that most people can be trusted.” When we used regression analysis to control for demographic factors, we found that the typical internet user is more than twice as likely as others to feel that people can be trusted. Further, we found that Facebook users are even more likely to be trusting. We used regression analysis to control for other factors and found that a Facebook user who uses the site multiple times per day is 43% more likely than other internet users and more than three times as likely as non-internet users to feel that most people can be trusted.

Facebook users have more close relationships.

The average American has just over two discussion confidants (2.16) – that is, people with whom they discuss important matters. This is a modest, but significantly larger number than the average of 1.93 core ties reported when we asked this same question in 2008. Controlling for other factors we found that someone who uses Facebook several times per day averages 9% more close, core ties in their overall social network compared with other internet users.

Facebook users get more social support than other people.

We looked at how much total support, emotional support, companionship, and instrumental aid adults receive. On a scale of 100, the average American scored 75/100 on a scale of total support, 75/100 on emotional support (such as receiving advice), 76/100 in companionship (such as having people to spend time with), and 75/100 in instrumental aid (such as having someone to help if they are sick in bed).

Internet users in general score 3 points higher in total support, 6 points higher in companionship, and 4 points higher in instrumental support. A Facebook user who uses the site multiple times per day tends to score an additional 5 points higher in total support, 5 points higher in emotional support, and 5 points higher in companionship, than internet users of similar demographic characteristics. For Facebook users, the additional boost is equivalent to about half the total support that the average American receives as a result of being married or cohabitating with a partner.

Facebook users are much more politically engaged than most people.

Our survey was conducted over the November 2010 elections. At that time, 10% of Americans reported that they had attended a political rally, 23% reported that they had tried to convince someone to vote for a specific candidate, and 66% reported that they had or intended to vote. Internet users in general were over twice as likely to attend a political meeting, 78% more likely to try and influence someone’s vote, and 53% more likely to have voted or intended to vote.  Compared with other internet users, and users of other SNS platforms, a Facebook user who uses the site multiple times per day was an additional two and half times more likely to attend a political rally or meeting, 57% more likely to persuade someone on their vote, and an additional 43% more likely to have said they would vote.

Facebook revives “dormant” relationships.

In our sample, the average Facebook user has 229 Facebook friends. They reported that their friends list contains:

  • 22% people from high school
  • 12% extended family
  • 10% coworkers
  • 9% college friends
  • 8% immediate family
  • 7% people from voluntary groups
  • 2% neighbors

Over 31% of Facebook friends cannot be classified into these categories. However, only 7% of Facebook friends are people users have never met in person, and only 3% are people who have met only one time. The remainder is friends-of-friends and social ties that are not currently active relationships, but “dormant” ties that may, at some point in time, become an important source of information.

Social networking sites are increasingly used to keep up with close social ties.

Looking only at those people that SNS users report as their core discussion confidants, 40% of users have friended all of their closest confidants. This is a substantial increase from the 29% of users who reported in our 2008 survey that they had friended all of their core confidants.

MySpace users are more likely to be open to opposing points of view.

We measured “perspective taking,” or the ability of people to consider multiple points of view. There is no evidence that SNS users, including those who use Facebook, are any more likely than others to cocoon themselves in social networks of like-minded and similar people, as some have feared.

Moreover, regression analysis found that those who use MySpace have significantly higher levels of perspective taking. The average adult scored 64/100 on a scale of perspective taking, using regression analysis to control for demographic factors, a MySpace user who uses the site a half dozen times per month tends to score about 8 points higher on the scale.